Sell-side sub-advisers and buy-side sponsors both tell us that their staff use public documents with the aim of extracting competitive advantage.
Sub-advisers seek to find peers whose business they can replace, sponsors try to find out what share of sub-adviser wallet they have for negotiation leverage and spot those others are buying or selling.
Neither regard extracting buried data from hundreds of public documents as their core activity or expertise, tying up valuable resources. Neither achieve consistent, quality results. Nor do they have the data structuring and front-end infrastructure to produce insights in an accessible format.
instiHub’s fully transparent sub-advisory solution is specifically designed to deliver what sub-advisers and sponsors seek. Gone are the days when every firm needs to replicate the same laborious process. Our existing user base from both groups agree.
Very few sellers and buyers of individually negotiated investment strategies, institutional or sub-advisory, large or small, have a central intelligence repository for all their pricing arrangements in accessible, let alone actionable, format. Email, Excel spreadsheets and Investment Management Agreements form a disparate array of storage means. How can firms ensure consistent pricing at a level that, compared to other existing deals, are most advantageous? How can firms plan or ensure they deliver good value for money?
instiHub’s pricing solution gives users the information they need at their fingertips:
And how about competition law? instiHub’s solution conforms to expert legal advice in this area. After all, investment management isn’t the only industry where individually negotiated prices are now becoming transparent. If the industry doesn’t come up with the solution, regulators surely will before long.
More about solutions
Download a PDF of the Factsheet (199KB)Download PDF
For more information about instiHub and to join our mailing list, please fill out the below form: